Thursday, March 28, 2013

Documentary Proposal


Proposal

Brandon, Tyler, Brooke, Cameron & Whitney

In the documentary we are proposing, we are focusing strongly on the different perspectives from a leader to a group member towards problems within the organization. Primarily, the purpose of the documentary is to expose the communication failure between members and leaders of the organization. Secondly, or more indirectly we may help inform leaders or members of the other perspective, consequently mend the communicational error in the organization. The documentary will be comprised of different elements and shots to contrast group leaders from members. The beginning will be a very general overview of shots and elements of the groups’ purpose, possibly showing shots of the groups meeting area and of leaders and members. Later in the documentation the groups’ communication failure will be narrowed in on, strongly exposing the differing perspectives to problems from leaders to members. As a more general overall description the documentary will expose how leaders and members perspectives to given problems are assessed.

To complete this task our group has created a planner to abide by to give each member an equal opportunity to participate in the documentary. Due to the unavailability of every member, different task has been given to each member:

Brandon: Interviewer
Tyler: Edit/Cut film
Brooke: Record Interview/Take Shots
Whitney: Contact Group/Create Meeting Times
Cameron: Create Script/Outline

To keep in contact a group email has been set up to document progress within the group. Different task may be more time consuming than others, therefore each member is asked to participate in every task, giving possible help in anyway. This is to help every member feel equal participation is kept.

The documentary has been planned out very well. The main composition will be of the interviewees answering questions asked by our interviewer (Brandon). Shots will be taken of the student center and room where the meetings are held, and also during the interviews. The shots will be mainly medium, comprised of the members and leaders during interviews. If possible during the meeting long shots will be taken to add the background aspect. To help give an overview of the organization, the beginning is very general footage and shots of the groups’ purpose and location. Further into the documentary there will be a symbolic transition or zoom into the main focus or issue of communicational failure among leaders and members. To help emphasize this focus, shots and footage are taken of both members and leaders. In turn to the leaders or members’ responses to our questions, we will have the leaders and members follow up on the others answers or issues noted. All together the documentary will be informative of issues any organization may encounter with communication, however in this case we focus solely on the Black Student Union (BSU).

The documentary is planned to come out very well organized. Each member has been given a part of the project to finish. The time interval to finish the project is fair, giving us enough time to hopefully get into a BSU meeting and gather a little more footage and possibly a few long shots. After said and done, the last part is to incorporate each member’s work together into one final piece to submit.

Schedule:
Friday, March 29th, 2013: Finished Proposal with task given to each member to begin.
Monday, April 1st, 2013: Have script finished.
Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013: Have shots of student center, and meeting area.
Thursday, April 4th, 2013: Start interviews and have footage and shots combined.
Friday, April 5th, 2013: Have shots and footage edited/cut to Moviemaker.
Monday, April 8th, 2013: Have rough draft of documentary together.
Tuesday, April 9th, 2013: Make final revisions to documentary. 

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Top 5 App. Tutorials

1. iMovie
2. Movie Maker
3. YouTube Maker
4. Filtering, Effects, Saturation
5. Framing, Image Composition

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Documentary Analysis


The three films use very different styles and all together a different composition. The film with Royce white uses very drastic non-diegetic sounds to help stimulate the actual mood of the scene. Royce also always seems to be the focal point, consequently having many close-ups, or mid-ranged shots of only him. Even though sounds helped stimulate the actual mood, silence was a great friend to this as well. The moment he was drafted him and his mother were shown hugging, but in entire silence, except to hear crying. This would help the viewer understand how stressful Royce’s life is with this condition and how relieved he was to be drafted. However, this video seemed only inform the viewer of how even professional athletes or soon to be athlete can suffer from anxiety.
On the other-hand, the video of Paul’s music collection used very contradicting approaches. The music always seemed to be diegetic in the way where Paul was always aware of the music playing. Lighting was very important in the making, because of the “vintage” idea of his collection there seemed to be this yellowish-green tint over the entire film. This gave the exaggeration of his collection being very old or original. On the contrary to Royce’s video Paul is selling his video.
            Korean Netiquette seemed to be similar to a type of manner or etiquette. In the video I found the subtitles very helpful due to the fact I’m not bilingual. The students were the main focus in the video, while the computers were the main topic. Each picture was a young child or something very closely related. Since the children were very young, and not exactly ready to speak on videos, consequently the video was entirely of the children’s participation in the activities. There was even scene of a man listening to the children singing songs related to the right ways to use Internet.