The scene starts off with Jim Carey walking into the training room. Very pointlessly he pulls his gun out and starts aiming it around. To give the impression this is a real exercise for policemen there were lockers, and the actors were wearing police uniforms. The scenery was depicted as a locker room. Jim Carey is the main focus of the scene, abusing all the policemen in a brutal manor, while supposedly teaching them the proper technique for policemen. The scene has no diegetic music, however the audience seems to play the non-diegetic role of sound. Every funny scene is followed by a crowd of laughter, but the actors are not meant to hear this. It becomes irrelevant to the scene itself. Even the actors other than Jim Carey play an insignificant role. Without Jim Carey the seen has no actual point. As the scene continues Jim Carey explains proper techniques for cops while harassing the other policemen. The end scene is Jim Carey attacking a cameraman recording the entire class.
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Scene depiction
The scene starts off with Jim Carey walking into the training room. Very pointlessly he pulls his gun out and starts aiming it around. To give the impression this is a real exercise for policemen there were lockers, and the actors were wearing police uniforms. The scenery was depicted as a locker room. Jim Carey is the main focus of the scene, abusing all the policemen in a brutal manor, while supposedly teaching them the proper technique for policemen. The scene has no diegetic music, however the audience seems to play the non-diegetic role of sound. Every funny scene is followed by a crowd of laughter, but the actors are not meant to hear this. It becomes irrelevant to the scene itself. Even the actors other than Jim Carey play an insignificant role. Without Jim Carey the seen has no actual point. As the scene continues Jim Carey explains proper techniques for cops while harassing the other policemen. The end scene is Jim Carey attacking a cameraman recording the entire class.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
2nd Speech
For my second speech I will be looking into Greek life. Particularly the fraternity Delta Sigma Phi. Last semester I rushed this fraternity, but with my GPA I was unable to initiate. Next Fall I plan to rush again, thus being the reason I'm researching into this group. I'm very familiar with the group members, I'll have much easier access to events and meetings to help with my research. I have found they have meetings in the fraternity house every monday, I'll contact the president this weekend to gather more information regarding my research.
Speech Analysis
First of all I promised myself to never resort to note cards. However, being ill i have had insomnia for about 2 weeks. It would've been much smarter for me to memorize my speech earlier incase issues occurring. But, if I wasn't sick i would've told myself to get plenty of sleep the night before. Besides the few unclear pronouncing, I kept my hands in a comfortable position. Standing in the same spot was a little more nerve racking, as you can see my knees continuously bowing out to relieve nerves.
Looking back at past speeches I was more prepared this time, just not ready for the illness to hit. The topic being about myself helped me paraphrase from the cards a little, helping to increase eye contact to the audience. Other than the physical aspect, the content was all there. The only con was speaking rather fast. A pro from the speech was possibly the connection of my introduction. Of course not everyone wanted to play professional sports as a child, but as I remember the majority had.
Using the entire stage (front of class) would've helped with relieving nerves, which is exactly what you said. However, not knowing the cameraman was wiling to rotate the camera I stayed in the same position. Bad thing about dressing semi-formal, the temperature in the room seems to rise much faster. Next time i'll be sure to wear proper attire that will fit with the temperature.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Speech Outline
Ethos
This
speech is entirely about me, which I believe gives me the credibility to give
the speech. Being a student gives me the credibility in explaining how student
life is. Even though not every student has the same life style, again I’m only
giving MY student experience.
Last
semester I found myself not preparing enough before hand, and not knowing
enough about my topic (except this time it’s about me). I tend to have awkward
pauses from not knowing what to say, which is similar to my last weakness. Since
I’m ahead of the game I can start studying and have enough sleep to be awake
enough in class when giving the speech. Forgot to mention I drink a lot of
coffee due to my deprivation of sleep (Can’t help but to stay up and watch How
I Met Your Mother). I’ve told myself to never drink coffee before speeches,
because I have nervous twitches and speak 100 miles an hour.
Pathos
The
only emotional connection I found relevant to my speech was my hook. It always
seemed every little kid wanted to play for an NFL, NBA, or MLB team. Starting
off with this introduction may bring forward the memories of the audience’s
child hood dreams, which I’m hoping will gain a sentimental feeling from each
individual. If the audience seemed to have no memories of a dream as a professional
athlete there will be no connection to them and my speech. Without a connection
there is no need for the audience to listen to my speech, which would mean I’m
giving a meaningless speech (but still hoping for a great grade).
Logos
I.
Introduction:
“Do you remember being a child and
telling everyone you were going to be a professional athlete?” My dream was to
be the quarterback for the St. Louis Rams. But, if that were true I wouldn’t be
here speaking to you. So now I find myself furthering my education at the
University of Kentucky, which I’m sure we’re all here for. If you’re only here
for the experience I hope the debt is worth it. But, other than the experience
being a student isn’t a walk in the park. Everyday I either dragging myself to
class or in the dark corner of the library by myself doing homework. I’m not
only referring about the 5 day week either, this is a 7 day planner for me.
II.
Body:
connection- Hard working individuals
1. Career
a. Everyday either in class or the
library (+imagery)
-(more about how working hard will help
me accomplish)
2.
Family
a.
3 siblings supported by just my mother
b.
Even when I was little my mother would drop my brother and I off at the
babysitters to go work her 2nd job.
-(look
for exact instance)
3. Entertainment
a.
Sports; football, baseball, basketball, bowling, and softball
-(make more social)
III.
Conclusion
(expansion):
Not everyone
gets the chance to become a professional athlete or even better further his or
her education.
Last Line: “But
I still think, how much easier would life be if I just became the St. Louis Rams
Quarterback?”
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Favorite Speech
Logos: Leonidas’ main point for fighting isn’t to win the
battle or war, but to have their names remembered. He states that they are
clearly outnumbered by the Persians. He states the Spartan law, “no retreat,
and no surrender.” So none of the warriors are curious he even adds that they
will die, but he adds on that their death isn’t taken for granted but for “an
age of freedom”.
Ethos: Leonidas is a King, respected by every Spartan
warrior. But, he also fights beside the Spartans as a warrior. He has the upmost
respect from every Spartan; every warrior would risk their life for him, and he
would do the same.
Pathos: Leonidas begins with an extract of Spartans law, “no
retreat, and no surrender, that is Spartan law.” He changes tone when saying
fight or Spartans, from die. Leonidas speaks directly to his warriors when
referring to “Spartans”. The warriors themselves feel directly impacted by
Leonidas’ speech. “A new age has begun, an age of freedom, and all will know
that 300 Spartans gave their last breath to defend it!” After this quote from
Leonidas the warriors respond with their chant acknowledging their acceptance
to fight alongside Leonidas.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Wesley Morris Argument
Kevin
Durant Going Back to School?
Ever since I can remember
professional athletes have never came “dressed up” for the occasion of a
conference. But, lately the National Basketball Association (NBA) has been
through a change. Athletes; Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, Amar’e Stoudemire, Kevin
Durant, even Blake Griffin are changing the face of the “black athlete”. Wesley
Morris’s gives different arguments. Morris explains how this change in the
clothing of these NBA athletes creates a lot of controversy. From 1980-2000
this type of clothing; long sleeved shirts buttoned up to the neck, backpacks
strapped tightly, large square framed glasses (which only Stoudemire has a
prescription for), bow ties, and even cardigans were clothes the stereotypical
“nerd” would wear. But, this wasn’t the only thought; anyone caught wearing
this clothing was a potential target for bullies. Even today there are many
issues with bullying, even escalating to committed suicides. Morris only hits
the racial aspect behind this diversification between the black and white
person. But, I believe this revision in the clothes these athletes wear
strongly changes children’s lives. The once called “nerd” now just seems to
have been ahead of his time in apparel for the last 30 years. This makes me
think this movement in the NBA could be potentially targeting bullying in
schools, and possibly a way to stop bullying. But, still I completely agree
with Morris’s argument, because his evidence is valid. Many shows during the 3
decades that dealt different race actors would have similar stories; the race
was inferior to the dominant race (being the white race). My favorite example
is the Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air; Will Smith played a role that is a great
example behind Morris’s argument. The series is all about this transformation Smith
makes from a poor household in West Philadelphia to the very wealthy Bel Air
mansion. Once again Smith plays the role of a stereotypical black man. Smith is
poor, dresses with very large clothing, and accessories of flat bills and large
watches. Morris again is very accurate when he explains how Smith makes fun of
Carlton, Philip, Ashley, Hilary, and Geoffrey. Without focusing on the race
Smith should be the one who is being laughed at. He is poor, lacks education,
and dresses very “street” like. After researching more into Morris’s argument I
even found Chris Paul is a big part of this change in apparel. State Farm has
been using Lebron James and Chris Paul for advertisements.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbRdDhYFGSw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl5R0fsJdOU
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)