During class I paired with one other classmate to peer review with. However, she wasn't given much to peer review because I had little to give.
My paper is very opinionated, explaining how unorganized the group meetings are. Also, how the meetings are in attire, attendance, and importance to the group. The meetings generally discuss the past weeks events and the future weeks planned. Without organization no progress is made. Similar to this idea I depict the entire scene of the meeting and give a detailed synopsis. This stance in the paper helps to give me an authors view of the scene, breaking down the entire scene. This way best suits the project.
While reviewing my peer's paper I found for the majority of her unfinished paper there weren't many errors. Especially, with the idea of ponging back and forth from play-by-play to a too detailed paper. However, I did mention to Jenna to be careful further in the paper. She had a tendency to mention a lot of the dogs actions, which was becoming very close to a play-by-play script. Even though the word count would've match, the scene depiction would've been horrible to read.
Due to me not having an actual essay to contribute my peer review was not very effective. However, I do feel Jenna has been given great advice from both me and Mr. Horton. I was also given great advice to base my future paper on. This review session is very effective, consequently I wasn't prepared with a rough draft of my paper as i should've been. Thus, I blame the lack of progress on myself. To solve this problem, i'd recommend giving a grade for the rough draft in class to ensure every student participates in the reviewing. On my part, I should've had a paper for peer reviewing.
No comments:
Post a Comment